Difference between revisions of ""The discussion on self-determination summed up""

From 4EDU
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Lenin, ''Collected Works'', Volume 22, pp.355-356
 
Lenin, ''Collected Works'', Volume 22, pp.355-356
  
To imagine that social revolution is conceivable without revolts by small nations <br>in the colonies and in Europe, without revolutionary outbursts by a section of the petty bourgeoisie<br> with all its prejudices, without a movement of the politically non-conscious proletarian and semi-proletarian masses<br> against oppression by the landowners, the church, and the monarchy, against national oppression, etc.<br>-to imagine all this is to repudiate social revolution. <br>So one army lines up in one place and says, “We are for socialism”, <br>and another, somewhere else and says, “We are for imperialism”, and that will he a social revolution! <br>Only those who hold such a ridiculously pedantic view could vilify the Irish rebellion<br> by calling it a “putsch”.<br> Whoever expects a “pure” social revolution will never live to see it. <br>Such a person pays lip-service to revolution without understanding what revolution is.<br>
+
To imagine that social revolution is conceivable<br> without revolts by small nations <br>in the colonies and in Europe,<br> without revolutionary outbursts by a section of the petty bourgeoisie with all its prejudices, <br>without a movement of the politically non-conscious proletarian and semi-proletarian masses<br> against oppression by the landowners, the church, and the monarchy, against national oppression, etc.<br>-to imagine all this is to repudiate social revolution. <br>So one army lines up in one place and says, “We are for socialism”, <br>and another, somewhere else and says, “We are for imperialism”, and that will he a social revolution!<br>
 +
 
 +
Only those who hold such a ridiculously pedantic view could vilify the Irish rebellion<br> by calling it a “putsch”.<br> Whoever expects a “pure” social revolution will never live to see it. <br>Such a person pays lip-service to revolution without understanding what revolution is.<br>

Revision as of 12:40, 15 November 2011

Lenin, Collected Works, Volume 22, pp.355-356

To imagine that social revolution is conceivable
without revolts by small nations
in the colonies and in Europe,
without revolutionary outbursts by a section of the petty bourgeoisie with all its prejudices,
without a movement of the politically non-conscious proletarian and semi-proletarian masses
against oppression by the landowners, the church, and the monarchy, against national oppression, etc.
-to imagine all this is to repudiate social revolution.
So one army lines up in one place and says, “We are for socialism”,
and another, somewhere else and says, “We are for imperialism”, and that will he a social revolution!

Only those who hold such a ridiculously pedantic view could vilify the Irish rebellion
by calling it a “putsch”.
Whoever expects a “pure” social revolution will never live to see it.
Such a person pays lip-service to revolution without understanding what revolution is.