"The discussion on self-determination summed up": Difference between revisions

From 4EDU
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Marijkecolle (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Marijkecolle (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Lenin, ''Collected Works'', Volume 22, pp.355-356
Lenin, ''Collected Works'', Volume 22, pp.355-356


To imagine that social revolution is conceivable<br> without revolts by small nations <br>in the colonies and in Europe,<br> without revolutionary outbursts by a section of the petty bourgeoisie with all its prejudices, <br>without a movement of the politically non-conscious proletarian and semi-proletarian masses<br> against oppression by the landowners, the church, and the monarchy, against national oppression, etc.<br>-to imagine all this is to repudiate social revolution. <br>So one army lines up in one place and says, “We are for socialism”, <br>and another, somewhere else and says, “We are for imperialism”, and that will he a social revolution!<br>
To imagine that social revolution is conceivable<br> without revolts by small nationsin the colonies and in Europe,<br> without revolutionary outbursts by a section of the petty bourgeoisie with all its prejudices, <br>without a movement of the politically non-conscious proletarian and semi-proletarian masses<br> against oppression by the landowners, the church, and the monarchy, against national oppression, etc.<br>-to imagine all this is to repudiate social revolution. So one army lines up in one place and says, “We are for socialism”, <br>and another, somewhere else and says, “We are for imperialism”, and that will be a social revolution!<br>


Only those who hold such a ridiculously pedantic view could vilify the Irish rebellion<br> by calling it a “putsch”.<br> Whoever expects a “pure” social revolution will never live to see it. <br>Such a person pays lip-service to revolution without understanding what revolution is.<br>
Only those who hold such a ridiculously pedantic view could vilify the Irish rebellion by calling it a “putsch”.<br> Whoever expects a “pure” social revolution will never live to see it. <br>Such a person pays lip-service to revolution without understanding what revolution is.<br>

Latest revision as of 10:43, 15 November 2011

Lenin, Collected Works, Volume 22, pp.355-356

To imagine that social revolution is conceivable
without revolts by small nationsin the colonies and in Europe,
without revolutionary outbursts by a section of the petty bourgeoisie with all its prejudices,
without a movement of the politically non-conscious proletarian and semi-proletarian masses
against oppression by the landowners, the church, and the monarchy, against national oppression, etc.
-to imagine all this is to repudiate social revolution. So one army lines up in one place and says, “We are for socialism”,
and another, somewhere else and says, “We are for imperialism”, and that will be a social revolution!

Only those who hold such a ridiculously pedantic view could vilify the Irish rebellion by calling it a “putsch”.
Whoever expects a “pure” social revolution will never live to see it.
Such a person pays lip-service to revolution without understanding what revolution is.